Iterative Design

Hopper


Design Cycle 1

Design Cycle 2

Design Cycle 3

 

 

"The main hopper with observations being checked in and out works well, that is what we need right now"
- User 17

"Yes, in some ways ownership makes sense, because that is what they are doing now - someone comes in with the skeleton plan"
- User 19

"You would have to make it easy enough and high-level enough so that someone could create that observation very quickly"
- User 20

"I think it is better where the lead science groups (lead group path) are more thematic and goal-oriented and the science drop-ins are more pul or pdl oriented."
- User 21

"I like having the plan linked directly to the data product, because that is always a pain to try to figure out"
- User 19